insert something witty here

April 28, 2008

Play with me, baby!

Filed under: media — Tags: , , — generic geek girl @ 22:01

Previously: WarGames: The Dead Code

Well, there’s a trailer now. I have to admit, it seems *slightly* more exciting than I’d originally expected. In all honesty, I’ll probably end up watching it some day, assuming I can find it on BitTorrent (which is pretty much a guarantee, seeing as misery loves company.. evidenced by the fact that several people uploaded The Pet *twitch*).

February 26, 2008

Don’t be so modest. You’re a rat, for Pete’s sake.

Filed under: media — Tags: , , , , , , — generic geek girl @ 12:48

*happy squee*

Ratatouille won an Oscar for “Best Animated Feature Film.” I don’t usually pay attention to such things, but I was a total refresh monkey on the Academy Awards website Sunday night, because I knew it’d been nominated in a couple of categories :) (It’s also won a variety of other awards.)

It’s such a great movie, and I’m so pleased it won. This was one of two films I bothered to go see in the theatres last year (Stardust was the other one, which I also highly recommend!), and the first DVD I’ve purchased in years. Pixar + rats + cooking.. what’s not to love? My only gripe is that they gave the rats the wrong number of toes, but I can forgive that for the incredible job they did otherwise. (I’m sure very few people noticed, and it probably made a huge difference in the amount of work they had to do, which meant that the rest of it could be even more awesome!)

Pixar’s next film, Wall-E is scheduled to be released at the end of June. I can’t wait.. it looks so good! *bounce* In the meantime, you can watch the trailers at the official website.

EDIT: the SO says we saw The Fountain at the theatre in 2007, as well. But it was the very first week of January, at a small local cinema (versus seeing it the previous November when it was released in major theatres), and everything is a little hazy, because I was incredibly sick at the time.

February 18, 2008

Would you like to play a game?

Filed under: media — Tags: , , , — generic geek girl @ 13:28

Coming out sometime this year: WarGames 2: The Dead Code

Oh god, why?

Wikipedia says:

The movie will star Matt Lanter as a computer whiz named Will Farmer who engages a government super-computer named Ripley in an online terrorist-attack simulation game. Little does he know that the online game he plays is actually part of a sophisticated piece of government spyware designed to find potential terrorists. Homeland Security, now believing Farmer to be a terrorist, sets out to apprehend him.

Found on IGN: “Ripley is a paranoid nutjob who’s hell-bent on placing pretty much everyone on Earth in a 3×3 cell, lest they turn unpredictably hostile.”

So.. it’s basically the same plot, only updated for the “War Against Terror”, and with a computer who appears to be a cross between his predecessor Joshua and HAL 9000?

Supposedly the original name was “The Re-Deadening” (à la the Simpsons?).

—-

While I’m on the topic of computers/hackers in film:

I came across this “Hackers” reference recently on I Has a Hot Dog, which led to me needing to watch the relevant clip on YouTube. I haven’t seen this film in years, and I’d somehow forgotten how incredibly, painfully bad it was.

“What code DOESN’T do in real life (that it does in the movies)” by Matthew Inman

Bonus points to anyone who knows where my avatar is from. :)

January 30, 2008

This is bad. This is very bad.

Filed under: gaming — Tags: — generic geek girl @ 17:28

I’m a big fan of interactive fiction, aka “text adventures.” They have the particularly nice feature that I can play them in my downtime at work, and not have anyone notice ;)

Recently, I stumbled across this game called “9:05″ by Adam Cadre. He does host it on his own site, but I suggest playing it at the Z-machine preservation project because it’s less buggy and allows you to save/restore your game. (Note that I said “less”.. I suggest saving before you switch to another window, or even another browser tab.) Alternatively, you can download the game and play it with an interpreter.

I’m not going to say much more about the game, except that you will probably want to play it at least twice. The game play is short, but it can be tedious. If you need item X in order to do action Y, and you already have the item, many games will just let you go ahead and use it without specifying that you take it out of your pocket or whatever. This game requires you to be very explicit with your actions. (Adam says he chose to do this to slow down the pacing. The whole point is that you’re trying to get out of the house quickly, so it’s a special kind of frustrating that there are all these things holding you back.) For this reason, I recommend saving your game before you drive anywhere. On the other hand, once you’ve reached the first (and obvious) ending, you may want to start over and pay more attention to things.

Seriously, the game should take under 10 minutes to run through all the endings (that I know of, anyway). If you have a couple of minutes, I think it’s well worth it :)

I also played another of Adam’s games, “I-O”, which has the lovely subtitle of “jailbait on the interstate.” I wasn’t as impressed with this one, though. *shrugs* The beginning is kind of cool, and you have to really think out your actions because you only have a limited number of turns. There are some other bits later on that I liked, but overall.. eh. The successful ending I managed to reach was pretty lame. If you decide to play, I suggest saving early and often.

Blog at WordPress.com.